Join over 53,000 subscribers looking to clarify, grow, and monetize their personal brand on LinkedIn. Each Saturday, you'll receive tips and proven strategies to use your unique personality and experience to grow a highly profitable LinkedIn following. 👉 This week's topic is "The Four Audiences You Need to Sell 1,000+ Books on LinkedIn."
Share
The 5 Sources of Inspiration That Power My Viral LinkedIn Content
Published 2 months ago • 13 min read
Read time: 8 minutes
The 5 Sources of Inspiration That Power My Viral LinkedIn Content
Perhaps the most challenging part of consistent LinkedIn posting is finding sources of inspiration to post about. Sometimes, an idea has been percolating within you for weeks and leaps right out onto the screen; oftentimes, that is the exception, not the rule.
So even if you have a calendar block for “content creation,” if you’re like me, you can spin your wheels waiting for creativity to strike. Sure, AI tools can give you ideas, but the best ones are built into a Content Operating System. Here is roughly what mine looks like:
Sorry if you can't read my handwriting.
After a decade of doing this in public, I noticed where my best ideas actually came from —and I built the discipline of returning to those wells before I ever sit down to draft a post. Today, I’m going to do a deep dive into each, because I want you to borrow them for yourself.
By doing this, I want to squelch any belief that you aren’t “creative enough” to publish regularly and build your million-dollar personal brand. That’s just not true! Big creators are just powered by systems, and it’s my aim to transfer those systems to you.
So here's the actual breakdown of my five sources, with documentation of real posts each one produced, plus a sixth bonus source I almost left off this list—but on reflection, it might be the most important one of all.
“The Remix File”: Your Own Best-Performing Content 🔀
The single most underused source of inspiration for most creators is the thing they already wrote.
I keep my AuthoredUp dashboard pinned at all times. Not in a vain "look at my numbers" way—in a "what already worked, and why" way. When a post hits, I don't move on. I ask: what's the framework underneath this? What angle did I take that resonated? What sentence structure pulled people into the comments? And most importantly: how do I extract the gold from this one post and use it to fuel the next five pieces of content?
I tag those accordingly as “viral”. You can see for yourself here:
In doing this, I noticed that last year, I wrote a post that opened with: "Two speakers. Same expertise. Same experience. One charges $7. Another easily charges $22K." It pulled 178,000+ impressions, hit "viral" status on AuthoredUp, and the comments were full of speakers asking me to dig deeper into the pricing dynamics I'd hinted at.
So instead of taking the win and moving on, I studied it, then reposted it months later. Ver batim.
It went viral again—50,000+ impressions on the re-run, a "viral" label a second time. (Wait 90+ days if you’re going to respin something in the exact same way)
Next, I turned that same core idea into two infographic carousels and two long-form articles. One post became the source material for six pieces of content, and the underlying tension—two professionals with identical experience commanding wildly different fees—has become one of the recurring through-lines of my entire body of work.
Remember! Our best ideas are not single-use. The post that resonated with your audience the first time will resonate again if you bring new framing, new examples, or a new format. The remix is not a shortcut. It's branding psychology. You need to hit the same point over and over and over and over and over and over again to seal in a brand association. And the creators I see growing fastest on LinkedIn right now are the ones who treat their own back catalog as a renewable resource, not an archive.
Here's how to build your own remix file:
Audit your top 10 highest-performing posts of the last year.Stanley Analytics, AuthoredUp , and LinkedIn's native analytics all work.
For each post, ask: what was the underlying idea, framework, or tension? Strip away the hook and the example—what was the point? (Stanley analytics plucks this out for you)
Categorize them by theme. You'll start to see your highest-performing themes cluster around three to five core ideas. Those are your franchise topics.
Pick one and write a new post that approaches the same underlying idea from a different angle, with a different example, or in a different format (text → carousel, post → newsletter, single anecdote → list of five).
Repeat indefinitely.
You don't need new ideas. Novelty of themes works against you, especially in an interest-based feed. You need repetition of topics in about a bajillion ways.
Saved LinkedIn Posts From Other Creators 💾
I save a lot of posts. Not to copy—to remix through my own lens (and to use as examples in this Newsletter).
The trick is to not only save viral posts, but posts that make you feel something. Disagreement counts. Mild irritation counts double. Exasperation is also gold. The post that makes you go "yeah but actually…" is almost always the one most likely to spark your next banger, because the "but actually" is your point of view showing up, fully formed, in reaction to someone else's frame.
A few weeks ago, Eileen Kwok wrote a great post breaking down something she'd heard directly from LinkedIn's team: putting a link in your post is not killing your reach. She walked through how the algorithm actually works and gave some other tips:
I saved it immediately, because the hook was so good; she tackled something head on that all of us spin our wheels on — Does a link in post actually kill my reach?!?!?
Around the same time, half my coaching community was still DMing me asking some version of "but does a link in a post kill reach?? There’s what they say and then what happens when I post it, which is my reach tanks!”
The discrepancy made me chuckle, because despite what the algo gods say, we all have a sneaking suspicion that links kill reach. So my exasperation of us going round and round led to this post:
4,000+ impressions, 60+ reactions, and a comment section full of people going SAME.
The deeper lesson here that I want to re-emphasize: don't save posts just because they were viral. Save them because they triggered something in you. The reaction is the raw material. The post you write next is the refined version of that reaction. The creators who only save what's already popular are doomed to produce derivative work, and that’s a losing game in the era of the personality hire on LinkedIn. The creators who save what moves them end up producing original work that resonates because the reaction underneath it was real.
Content From Other Platforms (Substack, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) 📝💬
If the only platform you consume is LinkedIn, your content will inevitably start to sound like everyone else's on LinkedIn. You'll write the same kinds of carousels. You'll use the same kinds of hooks. You'll fall into the same kinds of cadences. You'll start to look like every other consultant in your niche, not because you're copying anyone in particular, but because the LinkedIn ecosystem has a gravitational pull toward a certain kind of voice. The only way to escape that pull is to consume widely outside of it.
My move is to watch a TikTok (groan, I hate that platform but do it for reasons of sourcing), read a Substack, scroll Instagram, browse YouTube Shorts—and then ask: what does this look like translated for my audience with a LinkedIn format?
A while back, I saw a TikTok creator breaking down content ideas for people too scared to post on LinkedIn. The advice was great! And I had my own take, refined over years of teaching this exact problem inside my 30-Day Brand Builder. So I went home and recorded my own LinkedIn-native video walking through the four-week content plan I give every student:
That's what cross-platform inspiration is supposed to do. Not copy. Translate.
If you only read LinkedIn, you'll only write LinkedIn. If you read everything, you'll write better LinkedIn than the people who read only LinkedIn. (Sorry to give you extra platform homework here. But hey, at least I’m not telling you to post on those platforms!)
News Headlines (Especially LinkedIn News) 📰
This is the source most creators skip, and it's the most direct line to algorithmic reach available on the platform.
Here's what most people don't know: LinkedIn News editors are actively curating posts that engage with trending headlines for the daily LinkedIn News briefings and editorial features. If your post adds an expert take on something already being discussed, the editorial team can—and frequently does—surface it. When they do, you get distribution you wouldn't otherwise touch, and you get a credibility halo from being officially featured by the platform's editorial layer.
But here's the catch, and it's where most creators sink themselves before they start: the move is not to news-jack every trending headline. The move is to wait for a headline that lands inside your zone of genius and then swing.
On a personal note, how rich is it that Deloitte provides services around “human capital, strategy, innovation, and enterprise performance,” and cuts down parental leave, PTO, pension, and IVF-funding?!?!?! Jaw met floor on my end.
Remember, you're not chasing every headline. “Newsjacking” is not a complete strategy. You're waiting for the right one—and then moving fast, because news cycles are short and the editorial window for surfacing closes within 24-48 hours of a story breaking.
Beyond the editor surfacing, news-led posts work for a more fundamental reason: they slot into a conversation your audience is already having. Your audience is reading the news. They're forming opinions. They're looking for someone smart to make sense of it. When you become the person who interprets the headline through the lens of your expertise, you stop being a "content creator" and start being a trusted voice in a category. That's a categorically different positioning than "I post tips three times a week."
One quick aside: I follow LinkedIn editors with Taylor Swift-level fan excitement. You should, too. They're the gatekeepers of the surfacing layer, and they actively want to find expert voices. Make yourself easy to find. Engage with their posts. Tag them when your analysis is genuinely good. Become a known commodity in their feed.
My Own Meetings (Internal and External) 📋
This is my secret weapon, and I will scream it from the rooftops.
The best content you'll ever write is already coming out of your mouth—in client calls, in team meetings, in workshops, in casual coffee chats, in driveway conversations with your neighbor about how exhausting LinkedIn has become. You're just not capturing it.
For me, Granola records and transcribes everything. When I'm stuck on what to write, I don't sit down and try to "come up with ideas." I go back to the last two weeks of transcripts, dump 'em into Stanley, and let it find gold that I already said out loud to other people. The most authentic version of how you talk about your work is almost always the version where you didn't know you were "writing content"—the version where you were just answering a question, making a point, or working through a tension with a trusted collaborator.
The clearest example I can give you is my "I hit 45,000 followers" post.
Where did the post actually come from?
A reflection I had with my team in a marketing meeting. We were running through our weekly scorecard, and someone mentioned the milestone. I wasn't trying to write a post. I was just talking to people I trust about what hitting 45K actually felt like—that it took me 15 years on LinkedIn, not 6 months. That my path was not the "30K followers in 120 days" trajectory you see celebrated every week. That the milestone itself wasn't the point. That is the real question I keep asking myself, every single time I sit down to publish, is: Did I say something worth someone's time today?
The post wrote itself, weeks later, because the thinking had already happened in conversation. The transcript was the rough draft. I just edited it down, sharpened the hook with Stanley, and posted it.
Your meetings are doing the exact same thing for you right now. The frustration you voiced on a client call last Tuesday. The insight you blurted out in a strategy session. The way you explained your framework to a new hire on their first day. These are content. You just haven't been listening for them, and you haven't built the infrastructure to catch them.
Set up transcription on every meeting you take. Read the transcripts back weekly. Watch your content engine fire on a level you didn't know was possible.
The "Begging to Leap Out of You" Post ❤️
Sometimes a post writes itself in three minutes. Not because you're a genius. Not because the muse showed up. Because the thing has been rattling around in your head for months—maybe years—and it finally finds the keyboard.
I almost left this off the list because it's not technically an "external source." But the more I thought about it, the more I realized it deserves its own category. These are the posts that don't come from anything you saved, saw, read, or heard in a meeting. They come from a conviction you've been carrying. A frustration you've been swallowing. A truth you've been sitting on for a long time because you weren't quite sure how to say it. And then, one day, you say it. Fast.
These are almost always my highest-performing posts. And here's the kicker that confused me for years before I understood the pattern: they're also the posts I spend the least time writing.
Example:
Mike Rosenberg who writes some of the best LinkedIn posts about content writing on the platform, said it better than I can:
This is the part most creators get exactly backwards.
They assume that the post they spent three hours crafting, agonizing over every word, is more valuable than the one that fell out of them in 90 seconds. As Mike so eloquently states, often it's the opposite. The 90-second post is the condensed version of years of internalized thinking. The 3-hour post is the version where you were still figuring it out as you wrote or trying to “make it happen.”
So when something is begging to leap out of you—write it down. Don't talk yourself out of it because it felt "too easy” or “too edgy.”
These are the posts that get the DMs that say "damn, someone needed to say this." Not because you said something brand new. Because you said something true—and you said it with the kind of clarity that only comes from years of having the thought without being able to articulate it.
Trust those posts. Publish them. The ones that come fast are usually the ones that have been brewing the longest!
Here's what I see most aspiring thought leaders overlook when it comes to content inspiration:
They wait for inspiration instead of building a capture system. Inspiration isn't unreliable. It's just unmanaged. If you build the system, the system will feed you—consistently, on a schedule, without you having to "feel inspired" first.
They only consume their own platform. LinkedIn-only consumption produces LinkedIn-only thinking. The most differentiated voices on LinkedIn are almost always the ones reading widely off LinkedIn—Substack, long-form journalism, niche newsletters, books that aren't on the business bestseller list.
They underuse their own back catalog. Your highest-performing post from 18 months ago is still your highest-performing post. Mine it. Remix it. Reframe it. Post it again. The new audience that has found you in the last 18 months has never seen it.
They don't transcribe their conversations. You are giving away your best ideas every single day in meetings you don't record. Stop doing that. Granola, Otter, Zoom transcription—the tooling has never been more accessible or affordable.
They dismiss the easy posts. The post that wrote itself in three minutes is not less serious than the one that took three hours. It's often more so. The ease is the proof of internalized thinking.
If you scan all six sources, the pattern is the same.
You already have the material.
It's in your own work. It's in the posts you save. It's in the platforms you scroll. It's in the news you react to. It's in the meetings you sit through. It quite literally lives inside the convictions you've been mulling over for years without ever saying out loud.
Inspiration isn't a thing you go find. It's a thing you stop ignoring.
Your job is now to build a capture system for the ideas that are already passing through your day, and then to develop the discipline to sit down and turn them into something other people can use.
The six sources above are mine. Steal them outright. Or build your own list! Either way, get a list, make it visible, and refer to it weekly.
🎁 Here's a gift to get you started putting this into action right away!
100 prompts organized around the six inspiration sources I personally use to generate consistent LinkedIn content:
Remixing your own best-performing content
Reacting to other creators
Translating ideas from other platforms
Responding to news and trends
Mining conversations and meetings
Capturing posts that are “begging to leap out of you”
About the Author
Kait LeDonne is a New York-based personal branding strategist and LinkedIn coach who helps thought leaders, executives, and corporate teams turn expertise into visible authority, influence, and qualified deal flow. She is a featured instructor for CNBC Make It's "How to Build a Standout Personal Brand," bringing practical executive-grade playbooks to a broad audience.
Her LinkedIn audience and "Build a Brand" newsletter community exceeds 80,000 professionals. She has delivered training for organizations, including the United States Air Force and Kia. Listed by Favikon among the Top Personal Branding Influencers in the U.S., Kait is frequently cited in the media for clear, results-driven personal brand strategies professionals can sustain.
If you know someone who could benefit from this email, please forward it.
If you have been forwarded this email, sign up to receive more at www.kaitledonne.com.
Join over 53,000 subscribers looking to clarify, grow, and monetize their personal brand on LinkedIn. Each Saturday, you'll receive tips and proven strategies to use your unique personality and experience to grow a highly profitable LinkedIn following. 👉 This week's topic is "The Four Audiences You Need to Sell 1,000+ Books on LinkedIn."
Read time: 8 minutes Most Authors Will Never Sell 1,000 Copies. The Ones Who Do Run the Same 5 Phases Seven years, every kind of book campaign you can imagine, and one pattern that never breaks. In 2018, my cousin, a seasoned venture capitalist and serial entrepreneur, called me and pitched an idea. "Help me brand my new cannabis company. It's become legal in Maryland and I'm applying for a license." When I start to tell this story, most people reply, "Wow, what did you tell him?" To which I...
Read time: 8 minutes The Real Reason Some Speakers Stay Fully Booked (Hint: It's Not Their Credentials) "The riches are in the niches" is a phrase you've undoubtedly heard from every branding expert’s mouth at some point (mine included). As punchy and true as it is, though, for speakers, authors, and thought leaders, it always brings a very specific wave of discomfort: "Niching feels like leaving money on the table!" "What if I go all-in on one message and the bookings don't follow?" I get...
Read time: 8 minutes The Expert Era of LinkedIn Is Over AI turned expertise into a commodity almost overnight, and if you've ever felt you weren't expert enough to post, that's the best news you'll read this week. Here’s how to capitalize on the shift. Author's note: This is part two of a two-part series. Last week was the internal blocker — visibility shame, the reason you hold yourself back even when you know you should be posting. This week is the external one: the ground underneath the...